| Family ID | 29728 |
| Family name | Transcription Factor S-II Sub Family 3 |
| Synonym(s) | |
| Cross-reference(s) |
|
| Comment | IPR family, KEGG description |
Curation status ![]() |
|
| Phylogenetic analyzes | Not available |
| Clustering level | Family id (number of sequences) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 21399 (78) |
| 2 | 29728 (42) |
| 3 | 35390 (42) |
| 4 | 41109 (42) |
| Species | Number |
| Cyanidioschyzon merolae | 1 |
| Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | 1 |
| Ostreococcus tauri | 1 |
| Physcomitrella patens | 3 |
| Selaginella moellendorffii | 2 |
| Oryza sativa | 3 |
| Brachypodium distachyon | 1 |
| Zea mays | 2 |
| Sorghum bicolor | 1 |
| Vitis vinifera | 2 |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 1 |
| Carica papaya | 14 |
| Populus trichocarpa | 5 |
| Ricinus communis | 3 |
| Glycine max | 2 |
| Species | Number |
| Cyanidioschyzon merolae | 0.1994 |
| Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | 0.0599 |
| Ostreococcus tauri | 0.1294 |
| Physcomitrella patens | 0.0835 |
| Selaginella moellendorffii | 0.0576 |
| Oryza sativa | 0.0445 |
| Brachypodium distachyon | 0.0225 |
| Zea mays | 0.0372 |
| Sorghum bicolor | 0.0275 |
| Vitis vinifera | 0.0657 |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 0.0301 |
| Carica papaya | 0.5649 |
| Populus trichocarpa | 0.1098 |
| Ricinus communis | 0.0961 |
| Glycine max | 0.0264 |
| IPR | Annotation | Type | % | Occurence | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPR016492 | Transcription elongation factor, IIS | Family | 62 | (26) | Y |
| IPR006289 | Transcription elongation factor, TFIIS | Family | 43 | (18) | Y |
| IPR | Annotation | Type | % | Occurence | Specificity |
| IPR001222 | Zinc finger, TFIIS-type | Domain | 55 | (23) | N |
| IPR014765 | Transcription elongation factor, TFIIS/CRSP70, N-terminal | Domain | 26 | (11) | N |
| IPR003618 | Transcription elongation factor S-II, central region | Domain | 90 | (38) | N |
| IPR017923 | TFIIS N-terminal | Domain | 43 | (18) | N |
| IPR010990 | Transcription elongation factor, TFIIS/elongin A/CRSP70, N-terminal | Domain | 57 | (24) | N |

Warning: Please note that the gene tree was reconstructed using PhyML with no optimization (bioNJ). Gene tree with more robust parameters is being processed and will be updated very soon